by Rhapsody » Fri Nov 05, 2010 9:22 pm
I agree that abortion can never obviously be the free choice of a woman, although it is a legitimate opinion. There are people who think that killing and eating animals is obviously the right of every free individual, as there are those that would like to forbid it by law entirely, or only allowed under very specific conditions. To do as if there is no grey area where nothing is really that obvious is just shear denial, hence trying to make abortion the 'obvious' business of individual women where only conservative moralistic pricks can think otherwise... is a wee bit childish.
The golden question however is always how to reduce the number of abortions. Then realism and pragmatism rule. I prefer the not allowed, unless [ criteria a,b,c and preconditions d,e,f are met] formula for abortion, as also for euthenesia. Moral fundamentalism sounds great but it does make victims, too.