Not just the Tea Party..............
S&P downgraded Pres. Obama, the Entire Washington Establishment (both ReThuglicans and DemonRats) and we who elected them or failed to elect wiser & less corrupt leaders.
But how much faith should we put in S&P?
Didn't it do a Standardly Poor
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/791b2/791b2aff9b6891f2b3969a0808300cd476c89cd4" alt="Wink :wink:"
job rating the financial schemes of the Killer Klowns from Financial Space a.k.a. Banksters, Wall Street.
Credit rating agencies such as Standard & Poor's have been subject to criticism in the wake of large losses beginning in 2007 in the collateralized debt obligation (CDO) market that occurred despite being assigned top ratings by the CRAs.
Credit ratings of AAA (the highest rating available) were given to large portions of even the riskiest pools of loans. Investors, trusting the low risk profile that AAA implies, purchased large amounts of CDOs that later became unsellable. Those that could be sold often took staggering losses. For instance, losses on $340.7 million worth of CDOs issued by Credit Suisse Group added up to about $125 million, despite being rated AAA by Standard & Poor's.[6]
Despite common misconceptions, Standard & Poor's didn't rate the two major Icelandic banks, Kaupthing and Landsbanki.[citation needed]
Companies pay Standard & Poor's to rate their debt issues. As a result, some critics have contended that Standard & Poor's is beholden to these issuers and that its ratings are not as objective as they should be.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_% ... #Criticism"