by Tinker » Sun Jul 03, 2011 6:19 pm
Well saying it's a new technology is misleading. It's that it takes a lot of configuring and is beyond most people's skillsets, though it's not actually that terribly difficult. The modern Content Management Systems are getting far more sophisticated and I know of a couple of app developers that have Web GUI's for the creation of apps that can be published to iPhone or Droid. Mostly its lists and organization of lists that apps run. You can setup information aggregators and sell it as an app. Most of my IT has related to phones in the past few years. It used to be linking up their phones to their data. Now it's much easier to do that and people don't need me to do it for them as often. One of my more recent forays into that was a lady who I helped basically just choose her plans, by knowing what questions to ask I helped her buy a phone. These are the future of the IT industry ultimately. Google+ is already one of the largest repositories of people's actual useful data. It has the largest network of users on the planet. Facebook always talks about how many users they have, Google doesn't put it into those terms publically as often, it's not part of their brand identity. And this is the entire difference between Google's brand and Facebook from top to bottom. Facebook is ostentacious and has gained a reputation for being fast and loose with your data. On the other hand, Google has a better reputation in that regard.
Google will probably hold the final iteration of the centralized networking provider.
The future of this is in personal data security.
The canary didn't die because this mine is dangerous, it died because it's lazy and wasn't raised with a proper work ethic.