is obama terrible or what? lol

[Azrael]

[Tinker]

monster gardener Or we could just recognize that the comparison to Stalinism is facile and try and define what is actually happening rather than trying to fit it to a set of circumstances that don't apply in any way whatsoever.

[Demon of Undoing]

Nah, fuck that, Tinker. Obama is a Stalinist through-and-through. Between making that deal with Hitler, the NKVD purges, and starving the Ukrainians, hes a dead ringer and you know it, you bookfag.

[Tinker]

[Demon of Undoing]

[NapLajoieonSteroids]

We ain't have the time to see the differants between some of youse peoples and these peoples right hier:

[anderson]

[skyhook77sfg]

all right ladies...

you've had your fun.

lampooning without mercy has its limits.


poor Fred stumbled into the wrong place

after a long days work slicing reconstituted animal matter

at Arbys for your roast bif au jus french dip

and you lick your lips in a shameless frenzied gangbang

that begins to rival the tribal trysts on goldman pond.


so welcome aboard Fred.

bend over please.

[AzariLoveIran]

[Colonel Sun]

[Demon of Undoing]

[amos]

am (virtually) at the AskObama twitter townhall.....waiting for an answer to my question:

#AskObama Mr. POTUS, are you going to order a drone strike on Casey Anthony?
24 seconds ago Favorite Reply Delete

http://askobama.twitter.com/

[Ibrahim]

[Azrael]

[Tinker]

[Ibrahim]

[skyhook77sfg]

speakingt of continuation of Bush jr policies

this just in





A new poll released today of six Arab nations -- Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Morocco -- contains even worse news on this front:

The hope that the Arab world had not long ago put in the United States and President Obama has all but evaporated.

Two and a half years after Obama came to office, raising expectations for change among many in the Arab world, favorable ratings of the United States have plummeted in the Middle East, according to a new poll conducted by Zogby International for the Arab American Institute Foundation.

In most countries surveyed, favorable attitudes toward the United States dropped to levels lower than they were during the last year of the Bush administration . . . Pollsters began their work shortly after a major speech Obama gave on the Middle East . . . Fewer than 10 percent of respondents described themselves as having a favorable view of Obama.

What's striking is that none of these is among the growing list of countries we're occupying and bombing. Indeed, several are considered among the more moderate and U.S.-friendly nations in that region, at least relatively speaking. Yet even in this group of nations, anti-U.S. sentiment is at dangerously (even unprecedentedly) high levels.

In one sense, this is hardly surprising, given the escalating violence and bombing the U.S. is bringing to that region, its ongoing fealty to Israel, and the dead-ender support the American governmengave to that region's besieged dictators. Though unsurprising, it's still remarkable. After all, one of the central promises of an Obama presidency was a re-making of America in the eyes of that part of the world, but the opposite is taking place.


http://www.salon.com/news/middle_east/i ... 7/13/arabs


scroll down to the olberman/wilkerson video

hats off to col wilkerson for his unflinching devotion

to truth and the traditional values of America and its constitution

[skyhook77sfg]

President Obama has halted the Congressional decision to physically audit Ft. Knox gold.

There are many holes exposed in the audit method. Information leaks have justified the rumors that the majority of Ft. Knox gold has been removed and is in the possession of international banks in exchange for purchasing the QE2 bonds. Had banks not purchased the bonds, inflation would have already moved the country into crisis mode.

President Obama halted transparency even after a national mandate to physically view the gold.

It is very unlikely that any gold actually exists.

[Hoosiernorm]

Yeah this was a bad idea. Perhaps next I will invite some white supremacist or militant vegans to the forum, it couldn't possibly be any worse.



Could it?

[lzzrdgrrl]

I'm getting tired of the notion that telling , is bullying. Jus' sayin'........

[Colonel Sun]

[Colonel Sun]

[Hoosiernorm]

[skyhook77sfg]

Is the Obama national security team a pilotless drone?

George W. who? I mean, the guy is so over. He turned the big six-five the other day and it was barely a footnote in the news. And Dick Cheney, tick-tick-tick. Condoleezza Rice? She’s already onto her next memoir, and yet it’s as if she’s been wiped from history, too. As for Donald Rumsfeld, he published his memoir in February and it hit the bestseller lists, but a few months later, where is he?

And can anyone be surprised? They were wrong about Afghanistan. They were wrong about Iraq. They were wrong about Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction. They were wrong about what the U.S. military was capable of doing. The country imploded economically while they were at the helm. Geopolitically speaking, they headed the car of state for the nearest cliff. In fact, when it comes to pure wrongness, what weren’t they wrong about?

They may have disappeared from our lives, but the post-9/11 world they had such a mad hand in creating hasn’t. It’s not just the Department of Homeland Security or that un-American word “homeland,” both of which are undoubtedly embedded in our lives forever; or the Patriot Act, now as American as apple pie; or Guantanamo which, despite a presidential promise, may never close; or all the wild, overblown fears of terrorism and the new security world that goes with them, neither of which shows the slightest sign of abating; or the National Security Agency’s surveillance and spying on Americans which, as far as we can tell, is ongoing. No, it’s scores of Bush policies and positions that will clearly be with us until hell freezes over. Among them all, consider the Obama administration’s updated version of that signature Bush invention, the Global War on Terror.

Yes, Obama’s national security officials threw that term to the dogs back in 2009, and now pursue a no-name global strategy that’s meant not to remind you of the Bush era. Recently, the White House released an unclassified summary of its 2011 “National Strategy for Counterterrorism,” a 19-page document in prose only a giant bureaucracy with a desire to be impenetrable could produce. (Don’t bother to read it. I read it for you.) If it makes a feeble attempt to put a little rhetorical space between Obama-style counterterrorism and what the Bush administration was doing, it still manages to send one overwhelming
message: George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, et al., are still striding amongst us, carrying big sticks and with that same crazed look in their eyes.

The Global War on Terror (or GWOT in acronym-crazed Washington) was the bastard spawn of the disorientation and soaring hubris of the days after the 9/11 attacks, which set afire the delusional geopolitical dreams of Bush, Cheney, their top national security officials, and their neocon supporters. And here’s the saddest thing: the Bush administration’s most extreme ideas when it comes to GWOT are now the humdrum norm of Obama administration policies — and hardly anyone thinks it’s worth a comment.

On the Bush administration’s watch, the U.S. blew a gasket, American power went into decline, and the everyday security of everyday Americans took a major hit. Still, give them credit. They were successful on at least one count: they made sure that we’d never stop fighting their war on terror. In this sense, Obama and his top officials are a drone national security team, carrying out the dreams and fantasies of their predecessors, while Bush and his men (and woman) give lucrative speeches and write books, hundreds or thousands of miles away.


http://www.amconmag.com/blog/obama%E2%8 ... gue-world/