by Endovelico » Sat Mar 26, 2011 8:43 am
Thank you, Azari.
While I am all in favour of more education for all, nine years schooling - rather than twelve - does not hinder workers productivity much. I am more concerned with the lack of qualifications of many college graduates in respect of higher management functions. While it is very embarrassing to have only about one third of our younger people with a high-school diploma, that's not why we are underperforming. If I had to make a choice, I would rather spend more money in training people to make the right decisions at government level and at plant level (production managers and top management). If necessary, I would send them out to foreign firms, for a couple of years, to learn how to do it. Notice that Luxembourg, which has the highest productivity of the whole of Europe, has a work force made up 25% of Portuguese immigrants, who have as much schooling as their fellow countrymen in Portugal.
In 1972-74 I worked for the Lisbon shipyards, which were then the most efficient repair shipyards in Europe. All their workers and most of their engineers were Portuguese, and workers had no more than four years schooling. When the shipyard was being built (it had majority Portuguese capital, but also Swedish and Dutch shareholders), management sent the first batch of workers to Sweden and the Netherlands, to be trained on the job, as well as some engineers. That was all we needed to be highly efficient and successful. That's why I think that our problem is no longer mainly a problem of insufficient formal schooling. But I would strive to bring us more in line with our partners. Hopefully without falling into this trap: