by Captain Murphy » Wed Feb 09, 2011 6:51 pm
Alph, you're not quite right about research. That Washington University in St. Louis is "privately run" means, in effect, nothing. ? Likewise for a similarly-named, top-ranking research institution, the University of Washington, whose medical school ranks first in the nation and which also conducts research in medical imaging funded by organizations like the NIH (if I recall correctly, a principle source of funding for health and biomedical technology research).
At the front end of Intel's product development pipeline is university-sourced research. Not all of it is publicly funded, of course. Private consortia play a big role in mature industries like VLSI, but it's nonsense to claim that these would have existed without government research funding. The Colonel is right about VLSI and 3D graphics: these are the result of government work. The most sophisticated 3D hardware in the 70's, 80's, and 90's was sponsored by government funding and made its way directly into consumer-level hardware after Lockheed-Martin spun off its 3D business (which was then absorbed by either ATI or nVidia, can't remember which).
And who do you think produces the researchers at private firms? The companies themselves? Hardly. They're too cheap to train people properly. Given the option, they'll put the burden on universities (which they do) and look for PhDs who have been studying exactly what they want to implement. When the universities don't deliver, they tell the government it needs to do more.
Cutting edge research has rarely been the domain of companies run by clueless bean counters who use dubious measures of return on investment to plan operations.
Do you want the moustache on or off?