The Americans have not been the only ones squirming in discomfort at the uncertainty heralded by the decline of the Mubarak regime. Ten days into the protests the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia Sheikh Abdul Aziz Al-Sheikh condemned the Egyptian protesters.
In a statement widely quoted in newspapers around the Arab world he called the protests “chaotic acts” carried out by “enemies of Islam” to “divide the Muslim world”. The religious leader was speaking after Friday services in Riyadh on the same day that protesters in Tahrir Square had called for a ‘day of departure’ asking people to join protests after the Friday congregational prayers.
The Grand Mufti is not the only religious cleric to follow the political authority of rulers. Saeed Amer, a leading religious scholar at Al-Azhar University in Cairo and head of the fatwa committee, told an Egyptian newspaper that protests are forbidden in Islam. He said, “As for peaceful demonstrations they are rejected in Islam as Islam has never witnessed such a phenomenon.”
This stance on the part of the Al-Azhar University stems from the head of the institution being appointed by the Mubarak government, and hence the belief in kowtowing to its political demands.
While the denouement of the crisis and the impending ouster of the Mubarak regime are causing some Al-Azhar clerics to distance themselves from the regime, the Saudi case presents a deeper dilemma. The Grand Mufti enjoys a close relationship with the Saudi monarchy. In the particular case, Sheikh Abdul Aziz was appointed in 1999 after the death of his predecessor Sheikh Abdul Aziz bin Baz. Holding the position for over a decade, he has issued fatwas on a variety of subjects including the permissibility of child marriage for girls.
Given his relationship with the Saudi monarchy, the statements by the Grand Mufti pertain just as much to the local challenges faced by the Saudi regime as to the events in Egypt. While it is unlikely that widespread protests such as the ones in Egypt will spread to Saudi Arabia, recent events indicate festering resentment that is unprecedented in the country.
The protests in Egypt have laid bare these political manipulations that maintain theocracies like Saudi Arabia and Iran under the guise of religious sanction. In refusing to follow the edicts of Al-Azhar or the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia, Egyptians and by their example other Muslims around the world have learned that they can oppose religious leaders without denouncing religion.
It is in fact this final development that is most troubling for theocracies such as Saudi Arabia. When the Muslim public realises that opposing religious clerics does not amount to giving up religion itself, it becomes exceedingly challenging for self-styled Islamic regimes to justify mute acceptance of anything presented in the guise of faith.
While the ultimate outcome of the Egyptian uprising is as yet unknown it marks the development of a modern discourse of dissent within Islam as its most welcome gift. The protesters in Tahrir Square have defied the muftis and both prayed and protested creating a political position that has been heretofore unknown and whose time has finally come.
excerpt from:
http://www.dawn.com/2011/02/09/the-saudi-dilemma.htmlby rafia zakaria