by Tertulian » Thu Nov 10, 2011 12:19 pm
Azari,
I do not wish to quibble but my part of Africa - South Nigeria, specifically, the Igbos, have always had democratic values at least since the 10th century. When the British first came into contact with us they were confused with the fact that the chiefs they meet did not think that they had the authority to make decisions on behalf of the people but that each family, actully head of households had to be consulted. It is a messy process and often takes time before collective decisions are taken but gives everyone a stake in the system. In Western and Northern Nigeria the process of representation was a bit different. They had kings who had authority to speak for and make decisions for the people.
Tribal societies are not necessarily anathema to democracy because their system of communalism offers a solid foundation upon which democracies can be built. I agree that it is or at least has been difficult to establish democracies in Arab countries and also in large part of African countries. The same thing holds in Asia. I don't know what accounts for this in most of these countries but can attest that it is very difficult to have democratic societies in Muslim countries. Turkey is an exception but even it practices a sort of constrained democracy. It also had the advantage of suffering a significant defeat in WWI. It is easier to change a society or a country after it has experienced a catastrophic and long defeat.