Fontinau,
LOL LOL,

I am loving this dialogue bro! Loving it!
Don't worry abut hurting my feelings, you haven't! I grew up in an era & region of blunt communication. If you grew up in Boston, or lived there any length of time, you know the type. Similarly, I will not worry about hurting your feelings.
"Offense in always in the receiver, not the Transmitter!" Call it a verbal fight if you want, I can it an open and honest voicing of opinion. Nothing more! "Where everyone thinks alike, no one thinks very much!"
To shield another from your opinion, especially if you disagree with them, is a sign you neither respect their ability to judge matters for themselves, nor the validity of your opinion.
Regarding Azari, he is his own man. Sometimes I think him a fool, other times I value his wise perspectives. In other words, a typical human being. I refuse to judge anyone who has accumlated decades of knowledge on the basis of a few hundred or even a few thousands words. We are all long running videos, not snapshots of a frozen moment.
Regarding our previous discussion, don't be so quick to boil an individual who is a collection of thousands of variables, or a group who is a collection of millions or billions of variables, down to one or two variables, such as race, gender, age, nationality, etc. It requires intentional, purposeful strategy of ignoring circumstances and influences, ie: willful ignorance
That said, American culture has been in decline for decades, by many measures. If we limit our data points to a very few black individuals, compare MLK Jr. or Thomas Sowell, or Walter Williams, or Clarence Thomas to some of the more current "black leaders." The label of black, white, christian, feminist, etc. "leader" itself is horribly misleading. Who appointed the so called leader? Who do they speak for? None of the individuals in the ______ demographic group are herd animals. The media creates the title.
MLK Jr. was a fine man who spoke of the positive aspects of human potential. Judge an individual by the content of their character, not the color of their skin. No one can argue against that. That is a call to action for each person to their best self, and to expect others to judge you as an individual, based upon your actions, and no one else's behavior.
Now if an individual wants to label themself as a member of a demographic herd white, black, male, female, gay, straight, christian, jew, whtever, they lose the ability to define themselves! They are in effect saying judge me based on the actions of my herd label, not upon mine own behavior or merits. Very silly.
In additon, they also say my chosen culture as a ________ demographic herd animal, is in competion with the demographic herd animal culture label I choose to define you. Seems like a pretty stupid thing to do to me.
In short, show me your friends and activities, I'll show you your future. As Sowell pointed out, southern, rural, whites, and northern, urban, blacks both speak Ebonics. Both have similar cultures (brought over from the British highlands), both have similar levels of success, both cultures are voluntary. Both reap what they sow.