by Demon of Undoing » Thu Mar 03, 2011 1:40 am
Nobody said anything about supplanting locals. There are loads of vacant houses in the city.
And in fairness , if you are going to implement my idea , implement all of my idea.
To wit ;
The returning veteran , especially under current circumstances , represents more of a Federal investment than any other demographic. Between training and health care and the costs associated with a multiyear deployment to a combat zone , I can't think of a higher per capita expenditure. It is ridiculous to let that go down the tubes after four to six years. Significant personal development is not just something we hope happens along the way. Except for the shitbirds that need to in and out , such development is required for advancement. Built upon in a civilian context , in a civilian rubric , but with the latent character , work ethic and above all a continuation of a sense of true , useful service ( as opposed to simply breaking things and killing people) , much is possible. If they can break nations , they can build their own.
In light of that , I say we should ask the guys dodging from hesco to hesco if they' would rather come back to being a burger flipper , or sign on for a few years of college and work as an engineer or a teacher or a whatever is needed , wherever they need it. Federal service without the gunfire and early morning runs.
In terms of jobs , make Detroit the focal point for a concerted action with the same expenditure of effort and treasure that would be expended if it were Baghdad in 2004. Funnel schooling money towards local community colleges and state universities. Actually do something for the crumbling local infrastructure with an eye towards blank-sheet solutions that are forward looking and sustainable ( solar research Mecca ? What could U Mich come up with if you told them they had as much juice to create as Mattis had to destroy in Fallujah ? I bet it would be impressive). Other people can, I am sure , figure out far better things to do than I if provided that kind of force cohesion, concentration of effort and unity of command.
Two things, though. One , this is indeed the sort of centralized Federal , top down initiative that at heart I oppose. However , per the Robert Reich article , we already have a huge military jobs program , and keeping in mind objectives and power blocks , it works. I simply say to convert a Leviathan that we cannot use to bowl over small countries any more , but that is critical to the current way of life, into something that might actually help the country. If we don't disintegrate , we are looking at greater Federal presence any way you cut it.
Second , it's a pipe dream. Considering the various lobbies , like every other meaningful action that has potential to avert disaster , too many entrenched interests and lobbies would eat such a plan alive. In fact , it sort of already has. Obama proposed a civilian service corps ( much weaker effort than my idea ) and it went nowhere. He increased funding for the GI Bill , and nobody could figure a way to use that for the betterment of the nation as a whole.
No, Ibrahim, it would not work, but not because of violence. That's the easy part. No , it wouldn't work because America right now simply has no stomach for a working peace.
Don't know what it is, but I'm agin'it.